Home Office
War Office
Land
58
J
mentioned on 2006
supplied that such – Reference should be called for because (I think) the debt Arrangement allowed reference to the Emigration & Sariman. Complained test it was allowed to other Foreign Countries, to which he would only say that this for hard bar illustrated the problem. Emigration letter against Country for cut the third in 1870 & She said that with British Ships - 1871.15 all in all 4546.
In 1872 4210 went to Saigon – in 1872 & to Saigon 66: Jacona Sempefore.
Hankow with 382.
Casparks.
M Huber.
Ug Am
I cannot understand how the ships which carried this emigration obtained the License from Hongkong without which No Emigrant ship is allowed to Sail.
I thought that perhaps there has been some infringement, premising that the emigrants pay their own passage, the Act which is perfectly clear.
In 61 Hong Kong 1080. the previous despatch states that since the receipt of Lord Granville's despatch 74/70 (copy of which is annexed) no license has been issued for the conveyance of Emigrants to the US.
Best etmen explanation of deferments &c. Joreejer puts pem Ruin day 15/pr 18/0 Seedren cellaneous Offices
H
B
Page 60
Page 61
War
Mr Meade
do I have mentioned more than once I have num myself satisfied as to facts in the case of this emigration, & that I thought Jeffly the Act might only have facilitated the emigration of Coolies under Contracts, leaving free Emigration to its course, regulated by the Passenger Act - My belief was that the intention here was to prevent all Emigration of Kontract Coolies from Hong Kong to Foreign Countries.
Hom
Offic
War O
Land
58
J
menuti
on 2006
و
supplest that such – Reberme th Подравить
be called for because (I think)
the debt Antepredon
allow
referat
the Empration & Sariman
Complained test it was allowed. to other Preqin Countries, to which be would only say that this for hard bar aistrated te probelet Aegration letter daign Countrl_
for cut the third in 1870 & Shefi
that ith bre Smipants - 1871.15 all
inlt 4546.
In 1872 4210 went t
7
don Torasino – in 1872 & li Saigon 66: Jaczona Sempefore.
0
Hankol wilt 382.
Casparks.
MHuber.
Ug Am
I cannon understand how
the repels
which canzon this homigration
obtaire the
from Hongkong
forno's License without which No Emigrant repel. Sail.
is allowed to
Wthought that perhaps there under has some infringement pretime that the bimmigrante pay their
own
papaprastas the acto which Hendon with these Papers from perfectly clear.
In 61 Hong Kong 1080. the premor poriting states that mire the receipt of Lord Gramille's despatch 74/70 (coppontich is annexed) to to No license has been ipued
Rapenzership for the corregame
B
of Emigrants to the US. Best etmen
ng
in the Coxs 1tt par d
ashing explanation of deferments &. Joreejer puts
pem
Ruin day 15/pr
18/0
Seedren
cellaneous Uffices
H
B
Page 60Page 61
War
Mr Meade
do I have mentioned t
Land
hon than once
I have num myself
Lain
alle bin satrify an to farts in
the case
of this migration, &
that I thought Jefully the fort might only have fertilited the legation of Coblies under Contracts, leaving free Conspration to the Is course, regulated of conoce 4th Sepengers Art - My belief
wan hit the
to prevent
intention here was all lingration of Kontist Salzite
from Hong Kong 2. Forage Counties -
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.